kidof55 wrote:Which means that you as an employer will always benefit from this free day, so there's no wonder why you don't want to agree with me
Wrong. I derive no benefit from leap years. I have no salaried staff on principle, so they all automatically got five days pay for the week which contained February 29th. Not so Dickensian now eh?
If you think about it, I've never said that I want to benefit from this extra day, although I will still dispute that it's free. Again, all I want is fairness and equality for both employer and employee in a simple to understand and administer system.
Perhaps I didn't explain clearly above, but what I would like to see is bank holidays eliminated, but pay increased to compensate, so that no-one is worse off on an annual basis.
So, under my system, you will still be able to take your annual holiday entitlement, plus eight extra days, and be financially no worse off. What's the problem with that?
In fact there are advantages for you.
1. With no fixed statutory holidays, you could take your eight extra days whenever you liked. We as bikers could have them in the summer during good weather, and skiing enthusiasts could take them in the winter, etc etc.
2. By being paid for every day you turn up for work, you would actually get paid for February 29th!
Alan,
You don't lose a quarter of a day every year. You gain it. Those few extra seconds per day are your free time to do with as you will.
If you spent that quarter of a day per year at work then, yes, I could agree that you are due to be paid it back. But you don't, do you? So why should your employer be obliged to pay you again for time you have already had off?
Waiting patiently for a V8 Wing.